start time. In total, 3000 s = 50 min.
PMT gain distribution. Looks nice.
I give you results from my first look of the 22 strings data.
I used data of run #10894 which is taken 1st, August, 2007 (PFFilt_PhysicsTrig_PhysicsFiltering_Run00108984_Level0_Part00000000.i3).
I used a script that was used for the 9 strings analysis. (Thanks to Aya, providing me the script.)
Let me summarize at first.
Data seems to be mostly fine as far as I checked;) I will investigate the data in more detail.
|
start time. In total, 3000 s = 50 min.
|
PMT gain distribution. Looks nice.
|
|
cos(Zenith). There is a peak around 0.3. 
|
Azimuthal angle. Threre is two peaks. 
|
|
cos(Zenith) with #DOM>80 cut. The peak disappeared. 
|
Azimuthal angle with #DOM>80 cut. The peak disappeared, though we need more statistics. 
|
|
X position of the brightest cascades. There is a peak at 0,
but this is un-physical. This is same for position Y and Z. 
|
Y position of the brightest cascades 
|
|
Z position of the brightest cascades. The distribution is reflecting the dust layer. 
|
velocity of tracks 
|
|
hit DOM distribution. There is a gap at 80 DOMs. I think this is due to different trigger condition. 
|
LC triggered DOM distribution 
|
|
ATWD hit DOM distribution 
|
FADC hit DOM distribution 
|
|
total estimated Npe 
|
total estimated ATWD Npe 
|
|
total estimated FADC Npe 
|
total integrated ATWD charge 
|
|
total integrated FADC charge 
|
total (based) integrated charge 
|
|
ATWD amplitude distribution 
|
ATWD baseline. looks nice. 
|
|
ATWD integrated charge distribution 
|
ATWD estimated Npe 
|
|
ATWD occupancy vs OM ID 
|
hit position on X axis. uniformly distributed. 
|
|
hit position on Y axis. uniformly distributed. The peak is due to just
overlap of strings. 
|
hit position on Z axis. We see again the dust layer effect. 
|
Well, these results are more or less same as ATWD ones.
|
FADC amplitude distribution 
|
FADC baseline. looks nice. 
|
|
FADC integrated charge distribution 
|
FADC estimated Npe 
|
|
FADC occupancy vs OM ID 
|
hit position on X axis. uniformly distributed. 
|
|
hit position on Y axis. uniformly distributed. The peak is due to just
overlap of strings. 
|
hit position on Z axis. We see again the dust layer effect. 
|