back

Data Summary

Last Updata July 29 2007 by.Mina Inaba

PMT QExCE 337nm

DOM QExCE

Parameters in ROMEO

DOMINANT table

Acceptance simulated by ROMEO

PMT QExCE 337nm

Here are the values of PMT QExCE measured by Chiba in 2005~2006.
We used 337nm N2 laser(Laser Science VSL-337ND-S) as the light source.
We measured QExCE at PMT center and the threshold of our measurement was 0.5p.e.
Using this measured data , we estimated QExCE of other thresholds.
And we also calculated QE overall from QE@center q>0.0%.

Year	PMTName	QE @ center			QE overall(calculated from QE@center q>0.0p.e.%)
Year	PMTName	Chiba q>0.5p.e.[%]	Chiba q>0.0p.e.[%]	Hamamatsu q>0.0p.e.[%]	Chiba q>0.0p.e.[%]	Hamamatsu q>0.0p.e.[%]
2005	TA1052	19.3	24.5	20.1	20.7	17.4
	TA1059	17.7	22.9	18.0	20.7	16.2
	TA1062	19.0	23.7	20.5	20.8	17.9
	TA1069	18.8	23.7	19.4	20.4	16.8
	TA1167	18.0	21.8	17.8	19.7	15.9
2006	TA1895	16.4	22.1	22.6	17.8	18.2
	TA2026	14.4	18.4	18.7	13.2	13.4
	TA2086	16.5	21.0	20.5	17.3	16.9
	TA2146	14.7	19.7	20.2	16.7	17.1
	TA2182	17.1	23.3	22.9	19.4	18.8
	TA2259	13.7	18.9	17.1	16.6	14.6
	TA2349	15.1	20.4	18.7	16.4	15.1
	TA2374	16.4	20.5	21.2	16.3	17.2
2005+2006	TA0003*(Average)	-	20.0**	19.6***	16.4****

* The average of 13 PMT QExCE, 5 samples of Hamamatsu q>0.0[%] for 2005 and 8 samples of Chiba q>0.0[%] for 2006.
** Average of 2005Hamamatsu 5pmts and 2006Chiba 8pmts
*** Obtained from 16pmt average of Hamamatsu QE curve
**** Calculated from 20.0% (QE @center Chiba q>0.0p.e.) with 118 PMTs averaged charge Responses and 94 2DCEs.This value is used for the input of ROMEO

top

DOM QExCE

Here are the values of DOM QExCE measured by Chiba in 2005~2006.
The year 2005 and 2006 absolute data sets are obtained for different combinations of wavelengths because
the methods of the absolute calibration is different.
We noticed that we did not consider the loss of the charge in the BNC cable and so we recalculated QE of 2006.
The factor of the loss effect was 7.6%. This value is already taken into accoutn in the tables below.

Year	DOM_MainBoardID	DOM_ID	DOMName	@337nm	@365nm	@470nm	@520nm	@572nm
2005	025ae17702f7	TP5P0915	Shino_Inuzaka	8.29	-	-	-	-
	7829d43058f7	TP5P0919	Shinbei_Inue	7.03	-	-	-	-
	f4c0db8e6918	TP5P0917	Kobungo_Inuta	9.66	-	-	-	-
	1ddd6329fc1d	UP5P0914	Dousetsu_Inuyama	8.34	-	-	-	-
	ef089997c7a2	UP5P0916	Genpachi_Inukai	7.74	-	-	-	-
2006	2bcc76af5425	TP6P1513	IeNeko	-	15.4	18.9	11.5	5.78
	c0bb2366b6e7	UP6P1510	ManekiNeko	-	16.3	17.3	8.87	3.75
	799ee7c0cb81	UP6P1514	DorobohNeko	-	17.5	18.0	11.4	5.41
	fd67642aa63b	UP6P1516	YamaNeko	-	16.6	18.3	11.3	5.24
	b00a0d04c93f	TP6P1511	NoraNeko	-	18.0	19.0	12.1	5.93
	198858dc69cb	TP6P1517	BakeNeko	-	14.0	16.8	9.24	3.59
	364b66bca86f	UP6P1512	SuteNeko	-	15.3	14.0	8.21	3.60
	9cc6aee6e07f	TP6P1515	NemuriNeko	-	16.0	18.5	11.0	5.36
2005/2006	-	-	Average	8.22	16.1	17.6	10.5	4.83
2005/2006	-	-	Average (except ManekiNeko)*	8.22	16.1	17.6	10.7	4.99

*We used this data for comparing ROMEO and DOM data.
ManekiNeko is eliminated for the average data because it showed strange behavior compared to others.

Parameters in ROMEO

Here are the parameters used in ROMEO.

Year	PMT/DOM	PMT QE[%]@337nm*	Charge Response				2D_CE table@385nm	Hamamatsu QE curve
Year	PMT/DOM	PMT QE[%]@337nm*	sq0/q0	qtau/q0	Pe	more	2D_CE table@385nm	Hamamatsu QE curve
2005	TA1052/Shino_Inuzuka	17.395	0.30100	0.52100	0.283265	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA1059/Shinbei_Inue	16.2495	0.28733	0.51150	0.311522	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA1062/Kobungo_Inuta	17.9497	0.281984	0.53437	0.273966	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA1069/Dosetsu_Inuyama	16.7858	0.24600	0.461157	0.2847	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA1167/Genpachi_Inukai	15.8942	0.29975	0.6151	0.24452	[data]	[table]	[table]
2006	TA1895/IeNeko	17.7544	0.36305	0.35446	0.25438	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA2086/DorobohNeko	17.3254	0.29971	0.55627	0.30256	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA2146/YamaNeko	16.6793	0.251531	0.4280	0.34162	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA2182/NoraNeko	19.3915	0.26867	0.45464	0.362078	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA2259/BakeNeko	16.624	0.267892	0.462019	0.38073	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA2349/SuteNeko	16.3584	0.313522	0.5405	0.368235	[data]	[table]	[table]
	TA2374/NemuriNeko	16.343	0.312844	0.57291	0.273059	[data]	[table]	[table]
2005+2006	TA0003(Average)**	16.7661	0.2916	0.5057	0.2987	[data]	[table]	[table]

* PMT QE[%]@337nm overall 0pe threshold.

** TA0003 is a virtual "average PMT".
It uses the charge response and 2D_CE table averaged over 100 samples.
We used Hamamatsu QE for 2005 PMT QExCE instead of Chiba.

DOMINANT table

[8mm beam]
These tables are generated by DOMINANT for the ROMEO simulation.

angle_acceptance_8mm_385nm.data [fig]
wavelength_acceptance_withoutQE_8mm.data [fig]
QuickPhotonPropagatorMap_8mm_385nm.data

[13inch beam(parallel beam)]
angle_acceptance_withQE_13inch_420nm.data [fig]...............for AMASHIM mode
angle_acceptance_withoutQE_13inch_420nm.data [fig]
wavelength_acceptance_withQE_13inch_0deg.data [fig].......for AMASIM mode
wavelength_acceptance_withoutQE_13inch_0deg.data [fig]..........for calibration
QuickPhotonPropagatorMap_13inch_420nm.data

Acceptance simulated by ROMEO

Angular Acceptance

These tables are the angular acceptance data of the average PMT for each wavelength which simulated by ROMEO

337nm_angular_acceptance.data
365nm_angular_acceptance.data
470nm_angular_acceptance.data
520nm_angular_acceptance.data
572nm_angular_acceptance.data

Wavelangth Acceptance

These tables are the wavelength acceptance data of the average PMT for each wavelength which simulated by ROMEO

wavelength_acceptance.data [fig]

Link

IceCube wiki "DOM Acceptance Table for Photonics and Romeo" by.K.Hoshina

back

Data Summary

Contents

PMT QExCE 337nm

DOM QExCE

Parameters in ROMEO

DOMINANT table

Acceptance simulated by ROMEO

Angular Acceptance

Wavelangth Acceptance

Link